Since when did I say Newton was involved with computers? When I mentioned Newton's Law............I meant the analogy of it!!!! Everything that is.......has an opposite!!! In other words!!!!!!!...........If electricity/electronic-circuitry can be made to go one way........it only takes someone with the education of Newton's principles to understand that ANYTHING man-made can be reversed.........except of course the birth of a baby! If a "bug" or "chip" is inserted into a circuit for any reason by any person/corporartion, then anyone with a basic knowledge of electronics can REVERSE the process. Mate, there are people out there who enjoy, and make it their life's work, to screw up every operating system that's invented. It just so happens that some of these people are into electronics, and they DO like upsetting the apple-cart. Their ego won't let them stop. The rest is common-sense. You don't need to be a computer expert to be a hacker, you just need to understand how operating systems work.......and do the opposite. I am happy to know, via my technician, that this can never happen to PCLOS 2009 version, and that's all I want people to know..........if the community of computer users are having any bother with ANY system at all...........I say, UPGRADE to a better one..........and most of them leave Windows for dead...........especially in the security department.
quantumbluey 2009/4/8 mmmmna <[email protected]> > > Well, Kevin, you are trolling, here are my replies. > > On Apr 3, 8:59 pm, Kevin Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > > When some idiot decides to become a computer-hacker, or virus-writer for > > whatever reason, they only use ONE rule..........NEWTON'S LAW. Whatever > man > > builds or makes CAN be un-built an un-made, or even worse, manipulated > from > > within for other purposes, via reverse engineering. > > > Newtons laws are about how physical objects respond to motion. I'll > cite internet references for you: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion > http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newton3laws.html > http://teachertech.rice.edu/Participants/louviere/Newton/ > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/newt.html > > Newton did not discuss methods of hacking operating systems, Newton > did not reverse engineer anything that a man built. > > > > the TRUTH of the matter is this: ALL computers do NOT comply with ALL > operating systems > > Really, I'm only concerned with supporting gOS Linux, we are here to > discuss operating and using gOS Linux. > Forget about "ALL". > > > My technician, who happens to have redesigned PCLOS 2009, to work in ALL > > computers, will also show you things inside your own computer, which > should > > NOT be there and which have NOTHING to do with your operating procedures. > > "My technician says this, my technician wrote that, my technician > built this". > Use your own experiences, please. > > > These chips are in your computers, home phones, mobile phones, pagers, > > callboxes, even in some two-way radios, and also your new digital TV. > > As we both show people these dastardly little items inside their > appliances > > on a daily basis, many of them get rid of their TV's, computers and also > > mobile phones, and for the most part they are very happy. > > Yeah, I see you've heard of the Fritz chip. > Care to show me the Linux code which activates this chip? > Or will you have to get your technician so the technician can show me? > If you wish to get your Technician involved, START A NEW TOPIC > SOMEWHERE ELSE because the ensuing discussion will probably make > internet history. > > > When they learn what SONY stands for, they get very angry and go looking > for > > all the other company logos for computers or computing services around > the > > world, and after researching they get even angrier. > > Myself, I'm over the anger part and now teach this, but I need a computer > to > > keep up with what certain evil-doers are preparing for in the computing > > world, and for that I need a decent server, a double-sided Triple > Firewall > > (NSA type), and a few other little gems to make damn sure that NOBODY can > > get inside my files ever again. > > EVERYTHING is downloaded on an hourly basis into a secure file-server, > and > > can NEVER be compromised. > > The quote about Windows and brains still stands, basically because you > don't > > know who I am, what I do, or who I come in contact with. But I can tell > you > > this much, those that I do come in contact with who use Windows are sick > of > > it. Those who use gOS are happy, and those who are able to obtain PCLOS > > 2009, are ecstatic, even more than Apple people. > > I rest my case........and here ends the discussion. > > Well, sure, you alone are the master of that universe so if you stop > posting, yeah, here ends the discussion. That'd be OK by me. > > I've showed everyone here that for me, PCLinuxOS is faltering, you > added no proof that PCLOS is not faltering for me. > I've said that Bill Reynolds is the chief of PCLinuxOS, see: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCLinuxOS and > http://getpclinuxos.com/about/developers/ > You claim your technician designed PCLOS 2009. > > If you aren't going to offer to support gOS Linux here in OUR Google > Group, if you can't at least discuss the social impact of computing > which makes Linux installation or Linux use more difficult, please > LEAVE. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gOS Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/goslinux?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
