On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/05/13 13:14, Mitchell Baker wrote: > > 6. My suggestion for the Mozilla web properties: > > a: you go ahead and make the modules > > b: you note a code and a content owner, as we have long done for > > mozilla.org > > ....leaving the content owner blank for now if morgamic doesn't know who > it is or if it's not clear? > I would put Jennifer Bertsch down as the content owner. She's the product manager for Mozilla.org and coordinates all the stakeholders. Stormy > > > 8. And finally, as we find area of the modle ownerhsip document that > > seem limited or needing revision, or suggesting answers that don't work, > > we update it. For example, it's been pointed out that the current doc > > suggests only code matters. We should fix that. > > > > Any volunteers :-) > > Happy to fix that. Can someone point me at the message which brought > this issue up and perhaps has suggestions? > > Gerv > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
