Sorry to be late on this. On 10/07/13 19:03, [email protected] wrote: > 1. The list as specified has been added to the Modules page. There's > no way in the template to dd a Content owner: if there is someone who > can help with mediawiki templates please let me know so we can get > those in place ASAP.
I've added a optional "contentowner" key to the template. Example: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Activities#www.mozilla.org The technical owner uses the existing "owner" key. (Note: I used this module as an example because it already had two owners defined in the existing markup.) > 2. The original peers for the upper level module - myself, wenzel, > and clouserw - agreed I would become the top level module owner (as > successor to morgamic). Although this is a weird situation because morgamic had been owner for such a short time, it's worth mentioning that generally changes of top-level module owner need to go through the Module Ownership Module group: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Activities#Module_Ownership_System > 3. I had a question about Content owners. For many of the apps I am > personally responsible for, content is not necessarily a relevant > item, since the content is machine rather than personally generated. > In this case I assume the engineering owner is also the content > owner. Correct? If there are no or few creative or policy decisions to make about the content, then yes, it makes sense to me that the two owners are the same. (In that case, simply do not add a 'contentowner' key in the markup.) Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
