On 5/20/13 2:11 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 17/05/13 13:14, Mitchell Baker wrote:
6. My suggestion for the Mozilla web properties:
a: you go ahead and make the modules
b: you note a code and a content owner, as we have long done for
mozilla.org
....leaving the content owner blank for now if morgamic doesn't know who
it is or if it's not clear?
Yes.
8. And finally, as we find area of the modle ownerhsip document that
seem limited or needing revision, or suggesting answers that don't work,
we update it. For example, it's been pointed out that the current doc
suggests only code matters. We should fix that.
Any volunteers :-)
Happy to fix that. Can someone point me at the message which brought
this issue up and perhaps has suggestions?
it was this thread, which talks about responsibilities of the owner
being about patches, etc. that doc was written before activities
modules were developed, so there is a bunch of work there
Gerv
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
