El 25/10/13 23:26, Monica Chew escribió: > No, I don't. I mean there is a useful distinction between the follow 2 > classes of mail: > > 1) Official email from Mozilla, the organization, for things like summit > announcements, or service/product announcements. > 2) Email from people affiliated with Mozilla. > > It would be great announce to the world that all official Mozilla mail will > authenticate from Mozilla, say, using DKIM, and that all unauthenticated mail > claiming to be from Mozilla should be ignored. Because class 2) mail often > goes through mailing lists, it has different characteristics and is very > difficult to impose the same authentication requirements. See > http://www.dmarc.org/overview.html for more information. > > We already have these two classes conflated -- adding more addresses to a > domain that typical users will find visually indistinguishable from > mozilla.com, only makes this problem worse. Sorry but I don't follow you.
I don't see the problem of having [email protected] sending an email to a mailing list. The email identifies the person which is contributing to Mozilla, not Mozilla as a whole. It's the same on every institution or organization, there is no @gnome.org and @gnomers.org addresses, for me, it makes no sense. Regards. -- Rubén Martín [Nukeador] Mozilla Reps Mentor http://www.mozilla-hispano.org http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
