On 25/10/13 18:30, Monica Chew wrote: > I think it's a wonderful idea to give Reps and other contributors > email addresses. Can I suggest mozillians.org instead of mozilla.org, > though? mozilla.org is not sufficiently distinguishable from > mozilla.com to avoid confusing paid staff from not, and Mozillian has > the benefit of sounding like a person-descriptor.
I think making the distinction between paid staff and volunteers more clear is actively an anti-goal. When this program happens, I would like to see paid staff who qualify for @mozilla.org starting to use that email address as their primary Mozilla identity. A few of us already do that. > I should also point out that in the future, it may become very > important to be able to distinguish official email from Mozilla as a > project, versus someone who is affiliated with Mozilla (as paid staff > or not). Email always comes from a person, it never comes from an organization (at least, I hope Mozilla will never even attempt to be that impersonal!). I do not think there will be a problem distinguishing summit announcements from e.g. IETF contributions (which are always individual), even if both come from @mozilla.org email addresses. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
