2014-03-25 3:32 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > 1. Regularly scheduled town hall meetings (keeping world time zones in > mind) for high level news, feedback, and idea-sharing; maybe on an annual > or bi-annual basis, including recommendations that may be offered by the > convocation as a whole, with a majority vote of those present (including > those attending online), hopefully prompting Mozilla to take a very serious > look at these recommendations. >
AFAIK, there are regular town halls about all important topics when needed. The last one I remember was about the promoted titles and Mitchell talked yesterday about a new own about the CEO change. > 2. Regularly scheduled community election of delegates who could make > recommendations at annual meetings or such to the same effect as number #1. The Mozilla Reps program has a Council<https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReMo/Structure_Governance>voted by reps which aims to be a fair representation of the community. They are having a more relevant role each year and are very aware of "base" contributors/users opinions. > Without such engagement, I believe Mozilla will continue to be seen by > some as a mere "least undesirable" option, with Mozilla benefiting from > public participation and a sense that Mozilla really does have its heart in > the right place, but facing a sometimes unconcealed frustration from its > community supporters (e.g., small add-on developers) if not users, that our > voices are not being heard. > > Can you give some examples where do you feel Mozilla didn't encourage public participation? Almost everything at Mozilla is public beforehand. Regards. -- Rubén Martín (Nukeador) Mozilla Reps Mentor http://mozilla-hispano.org http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano http://facebook.com/mozillahispano _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
