You are mincing words, trying to evade the truth, as if there is some great 
difference between deliberately introducing a vulnerability that invades allows 
invasion of privacy and writing code that does it directly. Your central point 
that open source is always secure is completely wrong and you can't admit that.

But what you say does fit with the style here: evade and always end with "move 
on". When there is no reasonable defense, just muddy the waters and say "move 
on".

I now regret having wasted time here over these past few days. It's obvious 
that the intent here is merely to say empty words and try to ride out the storm.

Time to get back to convincing others, one a at a time, that Mozilla is steeped 
in politically correct bigotry and has no intention of changing. FF is the new 
IE. I'll point everyone to this thread as an example of never-ending 
dissembling, which goes a long way to destroying any sense of trust.

Have fun at Mozilla's "we love love love gays gays gays" festival.

(The hand of censorship will probably come down here soon anyway.)


13.04.2014, 19:18, "Rubén Martín" <[email protected]>:
> El 13/04/14 14:01, Big Fred escribió:
>
>>  It was just demonstrated a few short days ago that the open source OpenSLL 
>> had an included vulnerability (Heartbleed) that made a huge number of 
>> websites hackable, including the ability to decrypt all SSL traffic by 
>> making the server's private key accessible to hackers. The claim that open 
>> source guarantees security was glaringly proven to be untrue.
>
> You are comparing a vulnerability (intended or not) with Mozilla
> allowing someone to introduce a hack to list people who visit Christian
> sites.
>
> Yes, someone can try to introduce that malicious code, but not Mozilla
> as an organisation.
>
> That rationale can be applied to any kind of malicious code someone
> would like to introduce in Firefox, including any national security
> agencies. Open source allows anyone to be able to (sooner or later)
> detect it.
>
> In any case, talking about hypothetical cases here don't help to stay on
> topic with the situation we are trying to clarify.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Rubén Martín [Nukeador]
> Mozilla Reps Mentor
> http://www.mozilla-hispano.org
> http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
> http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
>
> ,
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to