Yes, I forgot to mention this, but another change for the meeting would be ensuring minutes/meeting notes are kept in an accessible place.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Mike Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the idea of publishing redacted-if-necessary notes. We're already > producing notes for the existing meetings, I'm sure we could strip out any > restricted content relatively easily as a "what's going on" checkpoint for > more casual observers. > > That said, I'm 100% in favour of the overall push towards a single meeting > where we can speak more openly (in line with recent Town Halls) instead of > the current divide. If I had to choose between strengthening our > communication with active non-employees and preserving 100% transparency, > I'd choose the former every time. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: governance > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf > Of Till Schneidereit > Sent: May 22, 2014 9:32 AM > To: Larissa Shapiro > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Michael Kelly; Matt > Claypotch; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Evolving the Mozilla Project Meeting > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Larissa Shapiro > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Til, > > > > I’d missed this before, and hearing that you did watch and value this > > is good to know - makes me redact my previous statement. I’d love to > > see data about how many folks like you are out there - while other > > sources have not shown me that the project call was a strong > > connection point for newer Mozillians, I do not want to stop a useful > > way that people are getting connected to us if there is not a reason to > do > > so. > > > > I didn't actually watch the call all that often. I did read the notes > almost > always, though. Hence my suggestion that we might continue publishing the > notes, with an explanation that they might be slightly redacted and that > becoming a vouched Mozillian isn't all that hard. > > Also, I have no idea how typical this is, so for all I know it might not > even be worth the effort to publish redacted notes. > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
