I agree with those who say that this is a great improvement. Thank you for listening and responding to feedback, and thanks to Mardi for the redraft.
On 23/07/14 13:36, [email protected] wrote: > You agree to challenge the status quo, to cause a ruckus -- but never > in a way that violates local laws, our internal policies or the > rights of any group or individual. There's a jurisdictional issue here on "rights of any group or individual". What people consider as legitimate rights vary widely across the world. If country X introduces a "right not to be offended" (to take an example of a non-universal right), and I live in country Y, and in a Mozilla context offend a citizen of country X (perhaps unknowingly), could it be said that I've not kept this agreement? There are many variants on this scenario (I'm in country X and they are in Y, etc.) Perhaps we can just ignore the problem, as this document is aspirational and inspirational, and so there will always be grey areas. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
