> On Dec 15, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Benjamin Kerensa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Mike Connor <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After a bit of an IRC sidebar with mhoye, I wanted to reframe this 
> conversation to a concise wording that (I think) reflects the core intent of 
> the Planet peers:
> 
> ===========
> 
> We're planning to move to an explicit tag model, where we will publish only 
> posts that are explicitly tagged as Mozilla.  This is not intended to exclude 
> off-topic content, but to encourage a degree of intentionality around the 
> content individuals choose to publish to Planet.
> 
> In terms of appropriate content, we believe the Mozilla Participation 
> Guidelines are a minimum baseline, and we expect everyone publishing on 
> Planet to abide by those guidelines in choosing where to publish.
> 
> ============
> 
> I think this is a much simpler expression of intent, and something I’m really 
> happy to see as a small but concrete step toward improving Planet.
> 
> Can we not achieve this through category based RSS feeds? It seems pretty 
> intentional that an author sends a request to peers and asks for a feed to be 
> added to Planet in the first place.
> 
> A category or tag would be fair but not just a tag.

Yeah, fair, software varies in how it does categorization.  The core intent is 
a shift from "publish automatically" to "publish intentionally” on the part of 
authors.  How we achieve that is a technical implementation detail.

— Mike
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to