It's a fair point. It's not a massive departure as much as it's a reinforcement of expectations: Be intentional. Choose what to push into a Mozilla space. Be excellent to each other.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Justin Dolske <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/15/14 11:08 AM, Mike Connor wrote: > > Yeah, fair, software varies in how it does categorization. The core >> intent is a shift from "publish automatically" to "publish >> intentionally” on the part of authors. How we achieve that is a >> technical implementation detail. >> > > It's a fine idea, although I don't think it's likely to have any practical > effect. > > At least, I don't believe any of the controversial posts to Planet in > recent history were accidentally posted there, or considered inappropriate > by their authors. So presumably they would still have intentionally set the > Planet tag on their posts. > > As one example: my own blog is syndicated to Planet with a category tag, > and it's actually set as a default category for me in Wordpress (because > that's always where I want posts to go). If I was to consider removing the > Planet tag, I'd probably just not bother blogging that content at all. > [Hello, Facebook and Twitter!] > > Still, it's good practice to have a category-specific feed, and we should > probably have required it from the beginning. > > Justin > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
