On 12/15/14, 5:15 AM, Axel Hecht wrote:
On 12/15/14 9:22 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Robert Accettura <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 14, 2014, at 9:58 PM, Benjamin Kerensa <[email protected]>
wrote:
How will you decide which feeds are dead? Are we talking dead as in the
RSS
feed errors or dead as in no recent content (inactive blog?)
There are quite a few that 4xx 5xx or just don't resolve.
Will peers attempt to reach out to those that are just erroring versus
not
resolving?
I think it's fine for that onus to be on the people that want to be on
planet.
Axel
We have a bug on file for every addition to planet since many years ago.
This means we can easily note in the original addition request bug if
and when we disable a feed for being "dead" (pick your definition) and
the owner of the feed can simply reply in the bug asking for
reconsideration. Alternatively, we can file a new bug for the removal
and cc the feed owner (get bugmail from original bug if needed) so the
owner can, again, simply ask for reconsideration. Re-adding a feed is,
IMO, not a serious cost so we shouldn't be too worried about disabling
feeds that seem dead.
- A
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
