On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Kyle Huey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> What does everyone think about logging irc channels for both transparency >>> and accountability but also to ensure compliance >>> with our participation guidelines? I know some channels have decided to >>> public log on their own starting this year >>> but we do not have an across the board policy. >>> >>> Obviously some channels where sensitive topics are discussed would need >>> to >>> be exempt but what about >>> the rest of the channels? >>> >>> Projects like the Ubuntu Project already do this for the same reasons as >>> above: >>> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ (Every channel related to the project since >>> 2004) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> governance mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance >>> >> >> What is the actual problem you are trying to solve here? >> >> - Kyle >> > > > The lack of being able to refer back to conversations had when personal > logs become unavailable but the conversation is important. We do not > currently use wiki widely to document conversations had on IRC and frankly > important decisions and conversations are had on IRC on a daily basis. > > I also for that matter believe having an archive so our users, partners > and anyone can observe important decisions or discussions had adds > transparency. > > The fact is as much as we would like for all of our important discussions > to happen in mailing list or on a recorded Vidyo call it just is not > practical. > So what is this subtext about "compliance"? - Kyle _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
