On Saturday, June 27, 2015 at 2:01:40 AM UTC-5, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > On 26/06/15 22:51, B Galliart wrote: > > - Why is a private/undocumented API needed and used? > > At a quick glance, it seems pretty well documented: > http://getpocket.com/developer/docs/overview
Great, can you provide a link to the document that documents "/v3/firefox/save" since that is one of the API calls used by the Firefox integration. > > - Why is the only server currently compatible with the Firefox integration > > of Pocket available only for non-commercial use? > > > > - Do they plan to take any legal action against compatible servers which > > clone the protocol? > > > > If tomorrow (or any other day in the near future) Pocket started clarifying > > the issues and it turned out all of these secrets where just oversight in > > them being transparent/open then I will be a lot happier. But I don't > > think we are even to the point of an ETA on reaching that. So far Pocket > > has not been very open. > > Have you attempted to contact them? I have. So far the only thing they have gotten back to me on is that "/v3/firefox/save" is a "private end-point." _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
