> On Jun 17, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Angly Cat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mozilla isn't a cult or some sort of religion. The logic behind their > decisions needs to be explained to the community. Can it be explained though? It *was* explained over replies in the past few weeks, but not accepted as good enough explanations. > Even now I don't know why this non-transparent non-community based decision > was made. > To demonstrate how it should have be done, let's compare Pocket(tm) > integration with any other "tough" Mozilla decision, for example, extension > signing. There were discussions for about half a year (which I was able to > participated in), several blog posts explaining why it has to be done, when > and how it will be done etc. And that feature isn't even landed yet. > But what about Pocket(tm) integration? It just - *pomf* - all of a sudden > appeared in our browsers, in nightly and stable versions simultaneously > (correct me if I'm wrong) without slightest explanation. And even now there's > no explanation. And I doubt there ever will be. That's the problem. > Many questions were asked here. Many answers were given. To say there's been no explanation feels to me like there's been a lot of talking and not a lot of listening to the responses. -Sheeri _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
