On second thought... I see where the requirements come from. Jim points out that we can precoordinate that into the domain ontology or we can consider whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model
Anybody have a preference on how to represent stuff like - maternal gestational diabetes - maternal BMI ? ________________________________________ From: GPC Informatics [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:15 PM To: [email protected]; Dan Connolly Cc: Russ Waitman Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal findings relevant to child) #103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal findings relevant to child) --------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: campbell | Owner: campbell Type: design-issue | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains2 Component: data-stds | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: 33 | --------------------------+---------------------------- Changes (by dconnolly): * status: closed => reopened * resolution: wontfix => * blocking: => 33 Comment: Looks like I was premature in closing this. I see discussion of maternal factors in **EHR Details 02-15-14.docx** attached to #33 Jim points out: > We can precoordinate that into the domain ontology or we can consider whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/103#comment:3> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
