Hi Jim Were you going to send the documents referenced on our call today? thanks Bonnie
Bonnie L. Westra, PhD, RN, FAAN, FACMI Associate Professor, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing & Institute for Health Informatics Director, Center for Nursing Informatics Location - WDH 6-155 P - 612-625-4470, Fax - 612-625-7091 email - [email protected] Mail - WDH 5-140, 308 Harvard St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Campbell, James R <[email protected]> wrote: > Phillip > Do you mean adding an attribute to patient dimension records? How would > the researcher employ that information without asking for some custom SQL? > Jim > ________________________________________ > From: Phillip Reeder [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:36 PM > To: Dan Connolly; [email protected]; Campbell, James R > Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal > findings relevant to child) > > In general, I would link to the mother¹s medical record with a ³Child of² > attribute. Currently, i2b2 doesn¹t allow that linking to be done through > the query tool, but it could be queried through the backend database. > > Phillip > > > > On 4/7/14, 1:20 PM, "Dan Connolly" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On second thought... I see where the requirements come from. > > > > Jim points out that we can precoordinate that into the domain ontology > >or we can consider > > whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model > > > >Anybody have a preference on how to represent stuff like > > - maternal gestational diabetes > > - maternal BMI > >? > > > >________________________________________ > >From: GPC Informatics [[email protected]] > >Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:15 PM > >To: [email protected]; Dan Connolly > >Cc: Russ Waitman > >Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #103: subject of observation (e.g. > >maternal findings relevant to child) > > > >#103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal findings relevant to child) > >--------------------------+---------------------------- > > Reporter: campbell | Owner: campbell > > Type: design-issue | Status: reopened > > Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains2 > >Component: data-stds | Resolution: > > Keywords: | Blocked By: > > Blocking: 33 | > >--------------------------+---------------------------- > >Changes (by dconnolly): > > > > * status: closed => reopened > > * resolution: wontfix => > > * blocking: => 33 > > > > > >Comment: > > > > Looks like I was premature in closing this. I see discussion of maternal > > factors in **EHR Details 02-15-14.docx** attached to #33 > > > > Jim points out: > > > > > We can precoordinate that into the domain ontology or we can consider > > whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model > > > >-- > >Ticket URL: > ><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/103#comment:3> > >gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> > >Greater Plains Network - Informatics > >_______________________________________________ > >Gpc-dev mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev > > > ________________________________ > > UT Southwestern Medical Center > The future of medicine, today. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was secured by ZixCorp(R). > > The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, > intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use > or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this > e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender. > > _______________________________________________ > Gpc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev >
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
