#158: usable view of LOINC lab terms
-------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: budh0007
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains3
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: 68 |
-------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by rwaitman):
Scott/Jim: please share.
Reviewing things with Sravani and Belay. It seems across our sites, that
UMN and WISC have the closest ontologies for labs that seem to be built on
the UMLS and can represent the different ways people might be mapping
atomic results (epic component_ids) to a loinc term.
Our goal is to have one consistent way for everyone to organize their
labs. Scott/Jim^2: did you review the WISC and UMN approaches or just
start denovo? Preferably your harmonizing with the existing work and that
the final approach is scriptable from the UMLS and doesn't require
curation.
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/158#comment:14>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
