#158: usable view of LOINC lab terms
-------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: nateapathy
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains3
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by campbell):
Nate
I have uploaded a copy of the metadata build for LOINC lab data that we
are deploying at UNMC. Based upon discussion at Hackathon 2, I don't
expect anyone to be interested in this (although anyone is welcome to use
it if valuable) but I have split out on the second worksheet the
METADATAXML that we prepared for 900+ of our lab tests for which we
verified units of measure and numeric ranges from our data warehouse. We
have included normal ranges for only a small set where we thought there
would be fair uniformity across sites but we have <LOWOFLOWVALUE> and
<HIGHOFHIGHVALUE> set for all based on statistical survey of results
ranges from our fairly voluminous lab history.
I wonder if it will not be valuable for Cerner to merge the METADATAXML
into the common GPC lab tests metadata that we agreed to share across the
network? or have you already created metadataxml for the release?
Jim
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/158#comment:23>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
