dan, thanks for the notes. i put the stats together between a combination of information from the coordinating center, from direct inquiries to the sites, and information that laurel grabbed from track. i did this to try and be as complete/updated as possible for the site visit.
i don't know that there are tickets for all of these things, as all of the steps weren't necessarily clear at the beginning. we at mfld can coordinate setting up tickets for the anticipated steps as we see them unfold. the tricky bit will be deadlines, as, e.g., the roll out of data characterization queries is intended to be one or two sites on behalf of the cdrn by some date (mayish) and other sites to follow along at some unspecified dates later on. we'll stay in touch with you as we work on this to optimize our tracking to meet all the needs. thanks, bob ________________________________ From: Dan Connolly [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:00 PM To: Verhagen, Laurel A Cc: Greenlee, Robert T PHD; Brandon Hamlin; Russ Waitman; John Steinmetz; Brittany Zschoche; [email protected] Subject: PopMedNet, CDM status for KeyGoalTracking Laurel, Bob, At the site visit, Bob just reported that * >= 6 sites have CDM builds * >= 5 site have the datamart client installed * >= 6 sites have done baseline queries * >= 3 have run & responded I'm interested in updating the KeyGoalTracking<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/wiki/KeyGoalTracking> table to reflect this; there are two relevant rows: * PopMedNet running and staffed * GPC CDM build (#160<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/160>) KeyGoalTracking shows 4 sites with PopMedNet running and staffed; that corresponds to "have run & responded," right? i.e. Bob's >=3 slightly under-reported what trac has. Fair enough. I'd like to give sites 5 and 6 some sort of symbol for "have the client installed" and "have done baseline queries". If I go looking through the tickets, am I likely to find this info? And w.r.t. CDM build, I'd like to give sites 4, 5, and 6 some sort of "CDM built using an alternative to the shared code" symbol. Do you know who they are? Should I expect to find that info in the popmednet tickets? I haven't asked anybody to put it there. I guess I'll cc gpc-dev so sites can let me know directly. Feel free to do the editing yourself, though editing tables in the trac wiki is kinda tedious. -- Dan ______________________________________________________________________ The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
