My understanding is that completion of data characterization queries for CDM V1 is a phase 1 expectation. We will probably face similar demonstration of compliance with CDM V2 but we do not need to finish that before June.
James R. Campbell MD [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Office: 402-559-7505 Secretary: 402-559-7299 Pager: 402-888-1230 On Mar 20, 2015, at 3:08 PM, "Greenlee, Robert T PHD" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Laurel when you get back in on Monday can you please work with the other sites as needed to help with dan’s request and let me know how its looking and if you have any questions. I still haven’t heard from a number of sites in the gpc in response to my listserv inquiry, but I’m pretty sure you were copied on all the ones I got. In the meantime, these are the sites I was referring to in my report at the site visit CDM: Neb, Mn, Mfld, UTHSCSA, CMH, KU V5datamartclient: mcw, neb, utsw, mn, mfld, uthscsa, cmh, iowa Recvd initial test query: mcw, neb, mn, mfld, uthscsa, cmh Ran and submitted test query results: neb, mn, mfld (did not mention uthscsa was planning to run this week, and that cmh was planning to run next week) If you want to know more about the source of my info for each one, I can clarify as needed. I mentioned in my email to dan yesterday I combined information from: the coordinating center, from direct inquiries to the sites, and information that laurel grabbed from track) We can recommend adding a few additional rows to dan’s sheet too for moving forward: 1) receiving and running the official data characterization query, 2) submitting the results of the data characterization query (all sites must await regulatory/data sharing approvals for this) 3) completing the data characterization error report dialog process with the coordinating center, 4) building cdm v 2.0, 5) v2.1. Thanks, bob From: Dan Connolly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 2:51 PM To: Verhagen, Laurel A Cc: Greenlee, Robert T PHD; Brandon Hamlin; Russ Waitman; John Steinmetz; Brittany Zschoche; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: PopMedNet, CDM status for KeyGoalTracking I'm working on phase 2 milestones, and I find that I could use even more detail on this stuff. I put together a DRN status at GPC sites<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Lg5fAHV5_rBT_FyF4_8NDuZC7KlNapLai90LEkdnxpI/edit?usp=sharing> google spreadsheet for us to fill out at or before the March 24 gpc-dev teleconference. -- Dan ________________________________ From: Dan Connolly Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:00 PM To: Verhagen, Laurel A Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brandon Hamlin; Russ Waitman; John Steinmetz; Brittany Zschoche; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: PopMedNet, CDM status for KeyGoalTracking Laurel, Bob, At the site visit, Bob just reported that * >= 6 sites have CDM builds * >= 5 site have the datamart client installed * >= 6 sites have done baseline queries * >= 3 have run & responded I'm interested in updating the KeyGoalTracking<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/wiki/KeyGoalTracking> table to reflect this; there are two relevant rows: * PopMedNet running and staffed * GPC CDM build (#160<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/160>) KeyGoalTracking shows 4 sites with PopMedNet running and staffed; that corresponds to "have run & responded," right? i.e. Bob's >=3 slightly under-reported what trac has. Fair enough. I'd like to give sites 5 and 6 some sort of symbol for "have the client installed" and "have done baseline queries". If I go looking through the tickets, am I likely to find this info? And w.r.t. CDM build, I'd like to give sites 4, 5, and 6 some sort of "CDM built using an alternative to the shared code" symbol. Do you know who they are? Should I expect to find that info in the popmednet tickets? I haven't asked anybody to put it there. I guess I'll cc gpc-dev so sites can let me know directly. Feel free to do the editing yourself, though editing tables in the trac wiki is kinda tedious. -- Dan ________________________________ The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender.
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
