Jim and everybody who is interested in a copy... The ​JAVA transformation code<https://pcornet.centraldesktop.com/c4gpc/file/36891223/> on Central Desktop was linked from a Jan 19 comment on #158<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/158#comment:20>.
Nate, I'm still interested in clarification on licensing. -- Dan ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Campbell, James R [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:53 PM To: <[email protected]>; Apathy Nate Cc: Campbell, Walter S Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #158: usable view of LOINC lab terms Nate So, if I understand, you had calculated or developed metadataxml for all the entries in the GPC lab metadata? Wow, I did not understand that from Hackathon2 and we would love to get a copy of your java code to supplement our metadata browsing tools. Did you develop a java-based computation of metadataxml from the LOINC release record? We have considered that but have not had time. I thought we might be providing an enhancement to your metadata build but I agree entirely that it seems irrelevant. Jim James R. Campbell MD [email protected] Office: 402-559-7505 Secretary: 402-559-7299 Pager: 402-888-1230 > On Mar 27, 2015, at 1:11 PM, "GPC Informatics" <[email protected]> wrote: > > #158: usable view of LOINC lab terms > -------------------------+---------------------------- > Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: nateapathy > Type: enhancement | Status: assigned > Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains3 > Component: data-stds | Resolution: > Keywords: | Blocked By: > Blocking: | > -------------------------+---------------------------- > > Comment (by nateapathy): > > We reviewed the metadata included in the UNMC LOINC hierarchy and found > 922 with metadata XML applied. We compared those leaf terms to our current > hierarchy and found 622 that overlapped with the 71,000+ terms that are in > our base hierarchy (the majority of which is hidden on Babel). All of our > metadata XML matched the data you had for yours, only with a few semantic > differences in naming conventions for tests within the metadata panel. > > Since there is not a major material difference between these two sets of > metadata, I'm inclined to direct the group to the information I shared in > [https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/158#comment:20 > comment20] on this thread. That comment includes a link to the base > multiaxial hierarchy from Regenstrief and the Java code we use to > transform that into our base LOINC hierarchy that was agreed upon as the > GPC hierarchy during Hackathon II. > > Let me know if there are any next steps or additional questions we need to > answer or clarify before we can close this ticket. > > -- > Ticket URL: > <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/158#comment:28> > gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> > Greater Plains Network - Informatics The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
