Ok, here is how I count 11 1) RX_BASIS DI 2) RX_BASIS PR 3) RX_BASIS AD 4) RX_DAYS_SUPPLY 5) RX_FREQ 6) RX_QUANTITY 7) RX_REFILLS 8) RX_STRENGTH 9) RX_ROUTE 10) RX_DOSE 11) RX_DETAIL
I guess you're counting the RX_BASIS as 1 instead of 3. --- Debbie Yoshihara -----Original Message----- From: Dan Connolly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:38 AM To: Debbie Yoshihara; [email protected]; Thomas Mish; [email protected]; [email protected]; Russ Waitman Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient As to who is going to look at them: i2p-transform (i.e. software to build PCORNet CDM from i2b2) consumes these modifiers. As to 11x: how many modifiers are you currently storing? You're already storing RX_BASIS, RX_FREQUENCY, RX_DAYS_SUPPLY, RX_QUANTITY, and RX_REFILLS somehow, yes? UNMC was proposing adding RX_STRENGTH, RX_ROUSE, RX_DOSE, and RX_SIG, but in discussion it emerged that "justification for including route, dose and detail modifiers ... is weakest in terms of use cases" I count 9 total modifiers in the proposal, 5 of which KUMC (and presumably the other 8 sites using the i2p-transform code) are already loading, and 3 of which could (from discussion so far) be removed without much objection. So to me, it looks like this is a proposal to go from 5 to 6 modifiers. -- Dan ________________________________________ From: Debbie Yoshihara [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:09 AM To: [email protected]; Thomas Mish; [email protected]; [email protected]; Dan Connolly; Russ Waitman Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient I have looked over these explosion of modifiers. For the med modifiers if you populated all of them that would make the facts 11x bigger for the med facts. Who is going to look at all of these? Or even populate them if they have them? The only other question I have is for the lab_mod, what is the difference between stat and expedite? --- Debbie Yoshihara -----Original Message----- From: Gpc-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GPC Informatics Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 8:46 AM To: Thomas Mish; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient -------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: preeder | Owner: mish Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: snow-shrine-2 Component: data-stds | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+---------------------------- Changes (by dconnolly): * owner: jay.pedersen => mish Comment: Tom, Is Debbie likely to complete her review this morning? -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/280#comment:17> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
