> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Churches [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:42 PM > To: General Practice Computing Group Talk > Cc: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' > Subject: Re: RE: GP Requirements - was [GPCG_TALK] Re: The Dreaming > > > Dr Nigel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I also note the "copyright (c) 2004 Ocean Informatics" on the > > archetype. > > See http://www.openehr.org/about_openehr/t_licensing.htm for > details of the licenses under which this and other openEHR > material is distributed. A reminder: open source does not > mean "no copyright" - in fact, the opposite: open source > licensing relies on assertion of copyright and observance of > copyright law. However, the copyright holder then uses an > explicit license to grant additional rights to end users, as > copyright law permits the copyright holder to do. > > However, I think that it would be useful
Even necessary, just as GPL'ed sources, for example, should carry both the copyright and license details. Nigel > to provide a pointer > to the licensing provisions in each and every archetype > published by openEHR (and others) - make it part of the > archetype metadata. > > Tim C > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
