>>If the EHR allowed you to sign a letter you produced (without having to >>email it) and sign incoming scanned docos, this would be quite >beneficial in >>Duncan's circumstances (as I think I already pointed out in a previous >>post). >> >> >I can't see how this is a solution to anything. Duncan can sign any old >crap and say it is a valid referral but there is no cryptographic or >even logical proof of anything except that he once signed it.
I am sure for most of you, this is not secure enough but it would satisfy MA requirements for an 'electronic' referral - signed by the bloomin' HeSA Individual key. If he wants just to be 'legal' and do this now, I believe that would do it, if the EHR had this function. If he wants to be properly secured having generated his own private keys and notarised to the hilt and everything else suggested on this list, then he shall have to wait, probably until the cows come home. Jan -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 24/02/2006 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
