No my mistake it was the Uncensored list
Michael Tooth wrote: > True enough, and it nearly started on this one recently as well. > > I am not sure that I am allowed to put everyone elses name up and so I > won't. Suffice to say that it is advisory in nature and full of people > who have the right degree of cynicism about the process, but yet are not > bent on derailing it. > > Michael > > Peter Machell wrote: > >>On 05/07/2006, at 6:33 PM, David More wrote: >> >> >>>Michael, >>> >>>If you want to preserve any credibility - tell us who is on this >>>group... >> >> >> >>Settle down please David, you haven't even given him a chance to respond. >> >>Many of us have just been through a horrible time on another list >>because these sort of threats got thrown around. >> >>Peter. >>_______________________________________________ >>Gpcg_talk mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > > _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
