Ian Cheong wrote: > I presume the meetings of the group are confidential, like most govt > things.... > and the usual idea is that all advice is taken and no power shall be > granted > and publicly, GPs will have been consulted, which gets the > decision-makers off the hook at the end of the day.
Oh well, if we cannot talk about NeHTA, Enrico Coiera would like us to talk about software accreditation. http://mja.com.au/public/issues/184_12_190606/coi10287_fm.html (Urgent debate is needed to move this agenda forward,12 <http://mja.com.au/public/issues/184_12_190606/coi10287_fm.html#0_BABBDEDI>") I'm in two minds about it. It would stifle new innovative products since the cost of accreditation becomes prohibitive. It would be nice if it made the current crop of applications more reliable, however. David _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
