CCHIT does that translate as "shit"?? pardon my ignorance
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ian Cheong
Sent: Sunday, 9 July 2006 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Practice Computing Group Talk
Cc: Enrico Coiera
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Should clinical software be regulated?
At 5:36 pm +1000 8/7/06, David More wrote:
>Hi David,
>
>Please go to www.cchit.org (if you haven't) and see how the yanks
>are doing it..planned, reasonable and not too expensive for most
>except the open-source people - for whom I think there should be a
>fee exemption.
>
>Their style of effort would do much, if transferred here, to make
>things better - not perfect..but a place to start building I reckon.
>
In September 2005, HHS awarded CCHIT a three-year contract to develop
and evaluate certification criteria and create an inspection process
for HIT in three areas:
* Ambulatory EHRs for the office-based physician or provider
* Inpatient EHRs for hospitals and health systems
* The Network components through which they
interoperate and share information
Given that they appear to be embarking on the beginning of this
journey, I look forward to the output of the process.
The history in australia is well known.
Ian.
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
