Tim Churches wrote: > Adrian Elliot-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> a better system would be one in which "free text" type entries occurred >> but you then highlighted the reason and right clicked or similar to >> interrogate the code entry dictionary. a less arbitrary coding system than >> Docle >> would be an incentive to use it too (as would reliable preservation of the >> coding when moving to other software) . > > Yes, and that's very similar to what Jon Patrick's group at Sydney Uni have > been working on. They still > have a lot of work to do and many bells and whistles to add, but what they > have already done shows real promise, I think. IMHO I would like to be able to enter an exact/idiosyncratic diagnosis, such as "T2DM, brittle", but also assign a code, thus forming a new thesaurus entry, so the association is made automatically next time.
Ian _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
