On Monday 24 July 2006 12:00, Thinus van Rensburg wrote: > I dug it out of the deleted bin after Olivier's reply and the article > raises good points - just a pity that Ken tainted it with his political > agenda. Not the first time either.
It is really funny (or bizarre?). Thinus, you always suggest others to be politically tainted - yet I don't know of many who would discard a message unread simply because of the assumed political orientation of the author. What political agenda exactly do you think Ken has? (apart from trying to improve our health service and quality of medicine ?) Why do you think that anybody not feeding from the pharmaceutical industry's pockets (or at least enthusiatically albeit uncritically pushing their products in return for a few trinkets) has some malicious political agenda? Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
