Horst Herb wrote:
On Monday 24 July 2006 12:00, Thinus van Rensburg wrote:
I dug it out of the deleted bin after Olivier's reply and the article
raises good points - just a pity that Ken tainted it with his political
agenda. Not the first time either.
It is really funny (or bizarre?).
Thinus, you always suggest others to be politically tainted - yet I don't know
of many who would discard a message unread simply because of the assumed
political orientation of the author.
What political agenda exactly do you think Ken has? (apart from trying to
improve our health service and quality of medicine ?)
Why do you think that anybody not feeding from the pharmaceutical industry's
pockets (or at least enthusiatically albeit uncritically pushing their
products in return for a few trinkets) has some malicious political agenda?
Horst
Ken, perhaps you would enlighten Horst about your affiliation and
past/present roles within the ALP - he obviously doesn't know about it
T
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
__________ NOD32 1.1675 (20060723) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
|
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
