On 31/07/2006, at 10:24 PM, Richard Hosking wrote:
Richard Most people would agree that a national deidentified dataset may be valuable in the future. I can see a big push looming from ADGP to drive their agendas using the existing infrastructure of the Divisions
This is our opportunity to kill off the whole divisions apparatus. We should studiously ignore them and all their projects.
Wal This could be the issue that finally kills divisions - if they dont get good takeup of such a program, govt will blame them. I doubt they will have either the expertise or the money to persuade GPs. Still a national deidentified dataset could be very valuable. You never know.
R
Wal Tracey wrote:
Andrew et al
Perhaps someone should ask Kate Carnell CEO of our very own ADGP who was a member of the board of the Pharmacy Guild & who no doubt seems to have strong contacts in Pharmacy as evidenced by the partnership she & the ADGP seem to be promoting eg the Memorandum of Understanding between ADGP & the Pharmacy Guild
the above links explain the structure of the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, which is the professional organisation for Pharmacists and the Pharmacy Guild of Australia which is, and always has been the business arm of the profession. Full membership of the Pharmacy Guild is only open to Pharmacists who own their own pharmacy. Last year I received a copy of a document titled *THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND DIVISION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT AND MEASUREMENT TOOLS WITHIN A NATIONAL E-HEALTH STRATEGY*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list
_______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list
Wal Tracey Norpalms 25 Barker Road Howard Springs
Ph 08 89831416 Fx 08 89814752 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
