I'd like to piggyback on the end of this theme with a request for arguments for the use of SCT in clinical practice. Last week I visited a hospital and met the IT staff who were very keen to develop the use of SCT for an enterprise wide "semantic Google" retrevial engine. The meeting was very successful at the technical level but the attendees were left with the signficant problem of what arguements they could use to persuade/cajole/bl---il clinical staff into supporting such a proposal. It came down to being able to say how they would individually gain from having such a facility. This has led me to address a wider problem of how does one justify the introduction of SCT at various levels of the health hierarchy, and the conclusion that different arguments would be relevant to different levels. I would be grateful if members of the list could give me arguments that might be used to persuade their fellow colleagues to take up the use of SCT. thanks jon
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
