Quoting Geoff Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Jon > > So what have you tried so far as a reason for SCT? > > What was the response? The general assertions that come from inverting your questions into statements but without devlopment of the HOW, and that's really what needs to fleshed out for a convincing argument. Jon > > I am also struggling to see immediate benefits for SCT beyond the > content > will be free... but that the software houses will generate some cost in > implementing the free content so from an economic perspective is not > free > and then there is the big national license fee that the govt has paid so > is > also not free... > > Geoff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 15 August 2006 7:46 a.m. > To: General Practice Computing Group Talk > Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Arguments for the use of SNOMED CT (SCT) > > Hi Geoff, > I agree with your commentary about current perceptions of terminologies > as > lists and it is the problem we are having troubles in some quarters to > persuade clincians to see value in SCT. Hence I asked my question to the > people I though would have the best set of answers, the GPCG list. The > result is your set of questions, which pinpoint the principal > motivators. > <big snip> > > > > To get the debate going I have thrown out some questions to help Jon > > along > > > > Will SCT result in better care? If so how? > > > > Will SCT make GPs more money? If so how? > > > > Will SCT mean that GPs are less likely to be sued? If so how? > > > > Will SCT make software development easier? If so how? > > > > Will SCT make software licensing cheaper? If so how? > > > > Unless you can mount these types of arguments I wouldn't worry about > > interface design - these types of things need to be shown if it is > going > > to > > be implemented and demonstrable differences are going to be obtained. > > Now I need the GPCGs answers to those questions, my answers aren't good > enough. > thanks > jon > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk > > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk >
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
