Hi Geoff, I agree with your commentary about current perceptions of terminologies as lists and it is the problem we are having troubles in some quarters to persuade clincians to see value in SCT. Hence I asked my question to the people I though would have the best set of answers, the GPCG list. The result is your set of questions, which pinpoint the principal motivators. <big snip> > > To get the debate going I have thrown out some questions to help Jon > along > > Will SCT result in better care? If so how? > > Will SCT make GPs more money? If so how? > > Will SCT mean that GPs are less likely to be sued? If so how? > > Will SCT make software development easier? If so how? > > Will SCT make software licensing cheaper? If so how? > > Unless you can mount these types of arguments I wouldn't worry about > interface design - these types of things need to be shown if it is going > to > be implemented and demonstrable differences are going to be obtained.
Now I need the GPCGs answers to those questions, my answers aren't good enough. thanks jon ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
