As we are in the final stages of clearing up this year's accreditation I am looking for the best place to publically complain about one accreditation company.
Deciding between the board of the company it'self, The RACGP, the fundholders, the medical popular journals or just to weep into my own beer. This company is inefficient and officious. Their feedback has been inconsistent and conflicting. The mistakes of the accreditors have resulted in most of our problems, but it is always up to us to prove what the truth is each time. Their concepts of applying the standards and dealing with conflict are illogical. All this, and they still delight in publishing glib, superficial and misleading magazines and urging practice staff to somehow recommend them! Unfortunately, the concept of eschewing accreditation/PIP and charging the patients more simply shifts the costs to the patients. jh On Thursday 10 August 2006 8:35 am, Peter Machell wrote: > On 10/08/2006, at 7:37 AM, Alex wrote: > > This is the contents of an email sent to the accrediting agency > > following an "accreditation" visit 2 weeks ago. I will never take > > part in the process again. > > Alex, would you mind if I forwarded this to a couple of doctors who > are almost convinced that the PIP is no longer worth the pain? > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- MIKE: [takes out a box of cornflakes, dumps it out on the table. A toy elephant is lying in the middle of the pile] Last one to find the jungle animal takes off all their clothes. [Removes the elephant] All right, your turn. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
