We just re-accreditedwith GPA - a GP and a non-GP accreditor. Everything was mostly done before the visit in order to cause least disruption to the working day.
Opening remarks were: It's nice to come back to your surgery. John Mac > john hilton wrote: >As we are in the final stages of clearing up this year's accreditation I am >looking for the best place to publically complain about one accreditation >company. > >Deciding between the board of the company it'self, The RACGP, the fundholders, >the medical popular journals or just to weep into my own beer. > >This company is inefficient and officious. Their feedback has been >inconsistent and conflicting. The mistakes of the accreditors have resulted >in most of our problems, but it is always up to us to prove what the truth is >each time. Their concepts of applying the standards and dealing with conflict >are illogical. All this, and they still delight in publishing glib, >superficial and misleading magazines and urging practice staff to somehow >recommend them! > >Unfortunately, the concept of eschewing accreditation/PIP and charging the >patients more simply shifts the costs to the patients. >jh > >On Thursday 10 August 2006 8:35 am, Peter Machell wrote: > > >>On 10/08/2006, at 7:37 AM, Alex wrote: >> >> >>>This is the contents of an email sent to the accrediting agency >>>following an "accreditation" visit 2 weeks ago. I will never take >>>part in the process again. >>> >>> >>Alex, would you mind if I forwarded this to a couple of doctors who >>are almost convinced that the PIP is no longer worth the pain? >> >>Peter >> _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
