On 17/09/2006, at 11:32 AM, Andrew Patterson wrote:

For a step by step debunk

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html


I don't think I would have quoted this site - looks like junk to me.

Some years ago when I was discussing how to best protect the wooden house I live in and its contents, an engineering (mechanical and electrical) friend of mine noted that no building with an operating sprinkler system had ever been destroyed by fire.

If for a moment we suspend our dislike of the unthinkable, does this change the way we look at the evidence?

Whilst the arguments presented for controlled demolition are plausible I think, on the conspiracy theory siteĀ there appears to be precious little discussionĀ  of the hijacking of the aircraft and their impacts on the buildings.

Alex


Dr Alexander G Bennett
Pomona Qld 4568
Australia

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to