At 11:15 pm +1000 17/9/06, Ian Cheong wrote:
At 10:41 pm +1000 17/9/06, Peter Machell wrote:
On 17/09/2006, at 11:32 AM, Andrew Patterson wrote:
For a step by step debunk
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Does a reasonable job on about half the points. The truth I think
would lie somewhere between the two.
Of course, the kicker for me is the premise that this
was all orchestrated by the genius' in the whitehouse
to get us into a war..
I'm not convinced of that either, but I think it's clear that truth
is not on their agenda.
btw I've been having some doubts about the moon
landings so if anyone has some material on that
it would be much appreciated
Of course you're right, it's all nonsense. George Bush is both
intelligent and honorable, no Government would ever lie to the
people, Telstra makes life easier, Nortons will keep your PC safe,
Australian Idol is full of talent. We should eradicate all these
loonies who question anything authority tells us.
Peter.
This one is interesting - seismic records of explosions prior to
plane impacts:
http://lasvegas.staughton.indypgh.org/news/2006/08/5415.php
And for comparison, seismic records from the Pentagon impact - rather
hard to notice despite similar size plane and close ground coupling:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
