On Saturday 23 September 2006 06:25, Ian Cheong wrote:
> A major item we are dependent on is our network switch. It's not
> likely to fail but if it does, the whole place goes down. Can we
> justify having a spare for several hundred dollars even though we
> don't really need it?
we had a spare, which was our old hub. But that has been pressed into service
to provide more working points and so I don't really have a spare any more.
Now for 6 doctors we have about 30 network points. No, we don't have wireless.
Liz
--
Suppose you're working on an optimizer to render \X unnecessary (or
rather, redundant, which isn't the same thing in my book).
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
