On Wednesday 25 October 2006 12:22, Tony Eviston wrote: > I know that sounds a bit Luddite but I do keep up to date with what's > going on and make judgments about how much of a threat each new > vulnerability poses to my particular system. > Sometimes rather than applying a patch I just disable the vulnerable > service (eg with the recent VML exploit). > This is obviously not a permanantly sustainable policy but so far I'm > happy with the run we've had.
Nothing Luddite about that - I think this is the most sensible approach. Never change a runing system without demonstrated need. I do the same on my systems. Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
