This is interesting. Especially the bit about no encryption on the Profile database.
Who is prepared to use a clinical database that is not encrypted ? Andrew C. PS: at no point (in my email at the bottom) did I suggest Intrahealth asserted ownership over the data, did I ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- From: Tom Donnelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2006 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Stephan Coetzee Subject: Data Ownership - without prejudice Andrew Have received information indicating various mis-information may be published in the public domain in relating to Intrahealth's policy in respect of data ownership. This email informs you of our position in respect of practice data - the following clauses are included in commercial agreements. Intrahealth asserts no ownership over practice data Intrahealth agrees to provide a data export to an agreed format at normal commercial rates Further information of note: Data stored in SQL or Interbase databases accessed by Profile is not encrypted If you are the author or know the author of information contrary to the above I require you make a public domain statement correcting such information or bring the enclosed Intrahealth statement to the attention of the author. Regards Tom Donnelly Chief Operating Officer P.O. Box 34-137, Birkenhead, Auckland www.intrahealth.com * Tel +64 (9) 480 7442 * Mob +64 (0) 210330 701 * Fax +64 9 480 7842 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
