On Friday 01 December 2006 00:08, Andrew wrote: > > Doesn't make me happy feeding overcharging opportunists with sour earned > > taxpayers money > So you're inferring that no patients at your medical centre (where I'm sure > you don't ever bulk bill) claim back from the HIC the fee's paid to you ?
Are you inferring that I am oivercharging or that HIC rebates even come close to fair remuneration? > Onthenet and the other B4H ISP's have to submit endless paperwork every > quarter to the HIC about every B4H connection they have. They also have to > have in place testing equipment to simulate a typical B4H customer so that > whenever the HIC desires it can check the quality and speed of the > connection is up to standard. So the taxpayer is supposed to paqy through the nose for moronic paperwork for no benefit - paperwork that appears costs several times what the actual service should cost? Anybody can test speed and quality and the complain - I use iperf whenever I am in doubt I don't get my worthwhile from my ISP. Don't need my ISP to do that - the ISP needs to do it to dispute my claims if there were any. In any case - with the pitiful download allowance under most B4H plans you don't get to use it anyway, so QoS is a moot point Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
