I have no problem with a) and a real problem with b). For the "average" non-technical Practice, any effort is too much effort. Many don't even know whar eclinic, or healthlink or fetch etc are. It's just that "the hospital" or "General Pathology" or whoever are not sending results through. They want a fire and forget solution that gets installed and they treat it as any other appliance. My (I think my first) posting on this forum was "Why so many download clients". While that question is now straightforward to me (largely Financial and business motives), I still can't see where the benefits lie with open source applications that do not hold ANY information.
And as you can see - even though the question is still out there, the responses surround the language used in formulating the question to the detrement of the question itself. Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horst Herb Sent: Friday, 1 December 2006 5:39 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] In reply. On Friday 01 December 2006 19:32, Chris Tansell wrote: > (paraphrased) - "All these savvy guys are SOOOOOO keen (on Argus), > surely there must be something in it, other than technological bias?" What do you understand under technological bias? a) preference of a product based on technological merits? b) preference of a product due to bias towards a certain technology regardless of merit? Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
