I'll see what we can do about this. Seems like a good compromise.
A
Horst Herb wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:11, Andrew N. Shrosbree wrote:
Yes, this does argue in favour of allowing the code to be branched so that
hackers can use (abuse?) the code as they see fit, but this would
necessitate ArgusConnect's washing its hands of responsibility for such
branched code. No, I am not being sarcastic or petulant: this seems like a
good solution, IMO.
I agree. The techie community at large (including me) is mostly interested in
fixing their own problems and making things work for themselves. That it may
help others too is a positive side effect that is not guaranteed.
Horst
--
Andrew N. Shrosbree B.Sc, B.Ec
Technical Director
ArgusConnect Pty Ltd
http://www.argusconnect.com.au
Mob: +61 (0)415 645 291
Skype: andrewshroz
|
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
