Oliver Frank wrote:
> 
>> David Guest wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone think openEHR will ever produce the goods?
> 
> Tim Churches wrote:
>>
>> the openEHR people assure us that several private
>> firms are using openEHR-based systems in deployed proprietary vertical
>> health apps
> 
>> Tools to actually
>> store and retrieve data using openEHR archetypes are at alpha or beta
>> stages in the openEHR secret laboratory
> 
>> Thomas Beale has offered access to
>> an openEHR engine hosted in the Ocean Informatics labs, to be accessed
>> via a proprietary Web service interface requiring the use of a Microsoft
>> C# .NET DLL on the client side
> 
>> All these openEHR tools still under development may or may
>> not be open sourced in the future
> 
> For something called *open* EHR, there seems to be an awful lot of
> closed aspects to it.

In defence of the Ocean Informatics and openEHR people, they have been
completely open regarding the concepts behind openEHR and the
specifications which cover most but not all aspects of it. They have not
sought any patents on their ideas, which is laudable indeed. Nor do I
don't think it is fair to criticise them for not being "open" regarding
their software implementations. Two tools have been released as open
source, and they haven't ruled out releasing the rest in a similar
manner, but that is uncertain. However, they never undertook to do so.
Thomas Beale has said repeatedly that there is nothing stopping others
from implementing the openEHR concepts as software, and he is correct,
and others have. The issue I pointed out is that, right now, none of
those implementations seem to be available in a production-ready state,
either as open source or as commercial components licensed for a fee,
which developers can use to build openEHR-based systems with - with the
exception, it seems, of Extensia's software, and on their own admission,
they have been "in internal mode due to corporate
restructuring and a focus on current projects, so there has not been
much fanfare to date", so perhaps I can be forgiven for not being fully
aware of their product - which I and I am sure others are keen to test.

Tim C

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to