On Saturday 16 December 2006 18:19, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > On Saturday 16 December 2006 18:16, Tom Bowden wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have had an interesting experience during the past 24 hours. On Friday > > afternoon I rang Robert Wood at NEHTA to discuss a couple of things; > > mainly issues related to my dissatisfaction at NEHTA's progress on > > progressing matters related to electronic messaging. > > Tom, I certainly thought that transition was "TO ELECTRONIC" > not "TO YET ANOTHER AUTHORITY" > > thanks for searching out this piece of political nonsense > now perhaps we can make some action perhaps someone had better tell the australian govt http://www.australia.gov.au/405 National E-Health Transition Authority The National E-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) has been established to accelerate the adoption of e-health by supporting the process of reform in the Australian health sector. To enable this to occur NEHTA will develop the specifications, standards and infrastructure necessary for an interconnected health sector. The development of the foundations for widespread adoption of e-health is NEHTA's core mission. www.nehta.gov.au
this phrase WAS on the nehta home page but not now - google has it still in the text http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=nehta&btnG=Search&meta=cr%3DcountryAU if you check that search -- Real Programmers don't write in FORTRAN. FORTRAN is for pipe stress freaks and crystallography weenies. FORTRAN is for wimp engineers who wear white socks. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
