Of course EVERYONE knew that this was a bodgy deal from the start when the 
Hunter Division introduced it - we all knew there was something going on.

Now everyone knows.

Fee, better than anyone else, knew that it was faulty from the start but 
persisted.

You get what you pay for.


David de Bhal


> FYI: James has forwarded this letter not only to Medtech Directors but to
> the ASX and the Fin Review (AFR).
> I suppose AusDoc & MedObs will note this as well.
> 
> Of note, James's list of problems is not exhaustive - many of his have existed
> since 2004 but ours have existed since 2002 and still nothing done, we have
> more problems than have been pointed out in this letter.
> 
> Medtech has been aware, I am told, of this letter since Monday, it is their
> responsibity as a publicly listed company to comply and respond to the 
problems
> officially raised and will no doubt, reply officially to the Stock Exchange.
>  These things always have ramifications on stock prices and the company's
> future.
> 
> fee
> 
> --- Start of the Attached Message ---
> 
> From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mach Dinh-Vu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Mae Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   "Medtech Help Desk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   "Kenneth Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Open Letter to MedTech Global Limited
> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:57:29 +1100
> [ Reply ] [ Reply All ]
> 
> Date 9 Feb 2007
> 
>  
> 
> From
> 
> James Bishop
> 
> Longevity Enterprise Pty Ltd
> 
> 8 Jackson Court
> 
> Doncaster East
> 
>  
> 
> To
> 
> MedTech Global Limited
> 
> Level 1
> 
> 83 Palmerston Crescent
> 
> South Melbourne, 3205
> 
>  
> 
> Attention Members of the Board
> 
> Mr Vino Ramayah Executive Chairman and CEO
> 
> Mr Simon Trevisan
> 
> Mr Ravindan Govindan
> 
> Mr Shane L. Stone
> 
> Mr Russell Clarke
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Dear Directors
> 
>  
> Open letter to Medtech Global Limited
> 
>  
> Quick summary
> 
> The significant amount time taken by doctors and practice staff to fix 
> problems
> and resolve caused as a direct result of failings of Medtech software add
> a considerable burden to Medical Centers who currently used Medtech 
software.
> Your company?s failure to address these issues has caused significant 
damage
> to trust and significant loss of goodwill. Several of your existing customers
> of Medtech software are not likely to be your customers in the very near
> future.
> 
>  
> 
> Action including a review of you companies software error and fault logging
> and timely notification of issue and faults to your customers and ongoing
> development needs to meet your customers are urgently required.
> 
>  
> 
> You may/should be alarmed to hear a new doctor at my practice used several
> software platforms over the last two years during GP training program. He
> rates Medtech32 clinically as the 2nd worst of the 5 medical software 
programs
> he has used.
> 
>  
> 
> Your failure to inform the stock market of some of these problems may be
> an issued for the Australian Stock Exchange Continuous Disclosure Rules 
specifically
> Chapter 3.1.
> 
>  
> Other Background
> 
>  
> 
> In December 2005 Medtech staff and I discussed several Medtech software 
problems
> and very specifically ongoing support issues. I expressed my dissatisfaction
> that frequently I was told by your support staff issues and problems I raised
> had not been reported at any other sites when I later found that many or
> most other sites using Medtech software were experiencing and reporting the
> same faults. Medtech staff agreed with me known faults with Medtech should
> be advised to users to enable us to deal with the faults until you could
> fix them.
> 
>  
> 
> Medtech staff suggested to me many of my problems and issues would be 
resolved
> by Version 5. Later I was assured 5.1 would fix my ongoing existing or new
> issues. When I was still experiencing problems I was told many of my 
problems
> with Medtech software would be solved by upgrading the Medtech data base
> to Interbase 7.5. I paid for and installed Interbase 7.5. I still have many
> of my original issues and a dozen new problems including new unacceptable
> possible legal issues and accounting and attribution problems.
> 
>  
> 
> Medtech staff assured me most support issues would be fixed by moving the
> support functions to Sydney from New Zealand. This has not occurred, lower
> level support is now much worse than the previous New Zealand based staff
> provided.
> 
>  
> 
> I was told a Medtech user forum/portal and issue register would occur in
> early 2006 which would list current issues. I later received an emailed of
> a revised timeframe of August/Sept 2006 timeframe. Your website now states
> it might be 2nd quarter 2007.  
> 
>  
> 
> It is odd that an issues or fault register (forum/portal) doesn?t already
> exist for MT32 users. It is poor customer service on your part not to alert
> all users to possible or known serious problems. As with most things in life
> or business, honesty and openness tend to avoid problems. Secrets and 
hiding
> problems cause or compound problems further.
> 
>  
> 
> It may be necessary to for users to pay for major upgrades such as occurred
> with MD2 to MD3 when they moved to an SQL database. Fixing basic ongoing
> problem is not a major upgrade it is required customer service or a warranty
> issue.
> 
>  
> 
> A some of the issues below have possible legal implications for my doctors
> and the practice. The legal risks I face if a MT32 systems failure caused
> me or others to be sued may be shared by Medtech if the failure is caused
> by an issue Medtech is aware of but failed to tell me or other software users
> about.
> 
>  
> Medtech software -Possible legal issues
> 
> I think possible legal issues for myself or others could occur as a result
> of errors with Medtech Software for the following problems. The possible
> legal issue may involve the Medicare Office, Professional Service Review
> audits, underpaid or overpayment of doctors or failure to provide required
> medical care due to medtech software issues:
> 
>  
> 
> 1.      Accounting- Attribution (Provider Income) altering in private accounts
> 07/2006
> 
> 2.      Accounting- Unable to correct invoicing errors 12/2005
> 
> 3.      Accounting- Quickbills remaining active indefinitely. Causing old
> quickbills to overwrite any new quickbill with the items billed and service
> provider and provider income details days, months or years later . Incorrect
> doctor being paid for services they did not perform 12/2006
> 
> 4.      MIMS updates - We pay for monthly Mims updates but due to MEDTECH
> issues can only receive and use a MIMs quarterly update 09/2005
> 
> 5.      INR Daily results - daily INR results are inactivated by Medtech.
> The Doctors comments including possibly daily alterations to dosage are 
hidden
> from view (unless filter is manually applied to include inactivated results)
> 08/2006
> 
> 6.      Medtech Support staff who are uninformed or untrained or dishonest
> who state common known issues are unknown or specific to my site only. 
Your
> companies failure to warn me and other users of known problems which 
cause
> ongoing faults/harm/damage which could be managed or controlled if you had
> the courtesy to inform/warn people of the fault with your software- ongoing
> 
>  
> Medtech software -Issues which affect day to day operations of my practice
> and cost time and money to control of rectify
> 
> 7.      Appointment Overview or Appointment pad issues
> 
> 7.1.   Patient status altering from ?arrived? to ?in consultation? without
> any doctor or staff actions 09/2005
> 
> 7.2.   System allow staff to double book time slots 09/2005
> 
> 8.      Reports -Patient Reports - Unable to include option to print In Box
> Documents- it aborts whole process- 03/2005
> 
> 9.      Accounting- Unable to correct invoicing errors 09/2005
> 
> 10.  Accounting-  Online claims transmitted. MT32 incorrectly showing that
> the transmission was successful and no errors When Medicare can confirm 
with
> an error type 9616 ?Bank details error?.  03/2006
> 
> 11.  Accounting-  online claims transmitted MT32 fails to tell us the error
> or the error code when it is being rejected by Medicare. 03/2006
> 
> 12.  Accounting- Medicare Benefits Schedule updates received days or weeks
> after the effective date for the account changes- Onging
> 
> 13.  Accounting- Batch reports not populating required fields 12/2006
> 
> 14.  Accounting- Insurance Cheque payments all paid and unpaid invoices 
displayed
> when receipting cheque received 12/2006
> 
> 15.  Accounting- Account details displayed at Account summary level but not
> if invoice is opened 06/2006
> 
> 16.  Accounting- Error loop created when invoicing requiring MT32 to be 
closed
> via Windows Task Manger before the affected computer can access Medtech 
again
> 
> 17.  PDF file- Inability to import and store PDF files into new patient 
> documents
> or as scanned documents 03/2006
> 
> 18.  Vaccine mapping- (and other mapping requirements)- Each site being 
required
> to enter coding and mapping details to enable functions and Mt32 ACIR 
transmission
> tool to work- Ongoing
> 
> 18.1.                    ACIR transmission faults and errors when the vaccine
> complies with MT32 supplied ?ACIR Vaccs.pdf? Ongoing
> 
> 19.  Lack of software built into Medtech32 allowing remote access control
> for Medtech support staff
> 
> 20.  Obvious lack of Australian General Practice doctor or practice 
management
> input into design, functions and development of Medtech 32
> 
>  
> Medtech software - Other Issues
> 
> 21.  Accounting or online patient verification- Medicare online patient claim
> or OPV confirmation window hidden locking or preventing use of MT32 until
> staff use Alt & TAB to see the information tab 06/2006
> 
> 22.  Displayed name incorrect- Name- preferred - and real name 09/2006
> 
> 23.  Text creation and editing significantly poorer than competing software
> products
> 
> 24.  Scanning tool not working with some multi function printers
> 
> 25.  Care plan modules - not as effective as several other E.P.C. tools
> 
> 26.  Memory issues on workstations which only affect MT32- requires closing
> and opening MT32 to resolve
> 
> 27.  Obstetrics and other mapping requirements- Each site being required
> to enter coding and mapping details to enable core functions and Mt32 tools
> to work Ongoing
> 
> 28.  Medtech user forum/portal- ?August/Sept timeframe (2006)?
> 
> 29.  The cost of Interbase 7.5 and marginal improvements resulting
> 
> 30.  Inability to apply most required software patches and upgrades during
> business hours.
> 
>  
> 
> Some of the above issues will be addressed by your next upgrade. Many of
> the issues I consider serious will not!
> 
>  
> Responses to date
> 
> ?         A patch to fix accounting attribution errors expected 14 Feb 2006-
> Chrissie advised by Mach Dinh-Vu 9Feb
> 
> ?         ACIR vaccine error- Mae Taylor Resolved 7 Feb 06
> 
> ?         Promised improvements in logging and dealing with faults - Mach
> Dinh-Vu 9 Feb 06
> 
>  
> 
> Support or Medtech staff including Mae-Sydney, Chrissie-NZ and Kenneth-NZ
> have provided good or great  support.
> 
>  
> 
> Yours truly,
> 
>  
> 
> James Bishop
> 
> --- End of the Attached Message ---
> 
> --- End of the Attached Message ---
> 
>       
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk



David de Bhal
www.v-practice.com


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to