In EHR I use, if select Riperidone (or Risperdal), it shows there are 2
packet of 0.5mg, 2 of 1mg, only 1 of 2mg, 1 of 3mg & only 1 of 4mg.  This
immediatly tells me there is different indications for 0.5 & 1mg, but only 1
indication for 2,3 & 4mg.  Also since GP's want coded information, the PBS
codes the 2 packets differently - so they know for which indication it was
used.  That is why they are listed as they are !

Cedric

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Horst Herb
Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2007 3:52 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] In quest of OS Medical Records for AU


On Thursday 15 February 2007 15:42, Thinus van Rensburg wrote:
> "Behavioural disturbances characterised by psychotic symptoms and 
> aggression in patients with dementia where non-pharmacological methods 
> have been unsuccessful." - click on the third authority link on the 
> page
>
> > And we are back to another typical Australian idiosyncrasy: 
> > disinformation, lack of information, artificial barriers to 
> > information, inefficient and unpredictable uinformation exchange.
> >  
>
> Or busy GP too busy to read his own reference?

Well - I consider it as brain damaged to expect a GP to click on three 
different icons to find out one piece of information regarding the same 
drug - without ANY hints that you might have to do that in order to find
that 
information

I prescribe generic. I also found out that the way my EHR program presents 
Authority information may be different depending on which row of
"Risperidone 
0.5 mg tablet" I click - again, no warning nor hint from the uI that this 
might be so.

You are right. I am in fact way too busy for such crap. Idisyncratic 
disinformation indeed it is.

Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to